Defense is way over done

[Alexey]

May I ask if you are from that 12k glory alliance and complaining about seeing too many 5-star attacks?

 

[StarTrekAlliance]

Alexey - So what are you saying? That only those with a certain glory level may have an opinion? At Star Trek alliance we allow all members to participate in WW regardless of skill level, age, or ability. So yeah, we get mismatches all the time with teams that sandbag. We don't sandbag, but because we allow new members to participate we have many lower levels, and yes, we have many high level players who are terrible at attacking. So what's your point?

 

[StarTrekAlliance]

No Angel - Cool! I see that! I am not participating in the current WW so that others on the team may participate. . My player name is 'Rob'.

 

[Alexey]

Based on this post I would say that you hate your alliance members. Your high ages are terrible in attacking, your lower ages struggle to learn, and you want defenses to be harder?

 

[Saruman the White]

5 stars should be reserved for the best attackers indeed. But now it's reserved only for cheaters. I can't see any legal attacking that would 5-star a similar-strength base. So I certainly vote in favor of attack. If you guys worry of losing 5 star to a weaker attacker, perhaps you should upgrade your defenses or use a different base layout and NOT RELY ON DEFENSE OVERPOWERING WHICH IS CURRENTLY BLINDLY PROVIDED BY NEXON

 

[Ask97]

I disagree. Like to like bases would get 5*-ed in all scenarios (adequately skilled attacker) with at the most requiring 1 TC. If the defence is 3D then more and very good skill if it is HTG.

I like the current ‘balance’ as it helps players who have developed both offensive and defensive capabilities and hence balanced