Rafar
Newbie in DomiNations
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2021
- Messages
- 384
I sympathize with Greeks Reborn.
Regardless of who happened to lose glory, if the objective was to punish inactivity or something similar, then there was a failure in the applied process.
As far as I know, there is nothing illegal about users switching allegiances, either alone or in a group. There are several situations that this can occur without being considered unethical, but first of all it is not illegal.
Therefore, punishing active alliances in wars because they didn't have a certain amount of players in a single moment seems to me to be inadequate.
I'm a Glory Decay enthusiast, but I've always asked for transparency in the process and parameters. This transparency was denied by the BHG Moderator.
The process needs tweaking and can be improved a lot to make the game better, but mistakes during the process must be fixed.
Regardless of who happened to lose glory, if the objective was to punish inactivity or something similar, then there was a failure in the applied process.
As far as I know, there is nothing illegal about users switching allegiances, either alone or in a group. There are several situations that this can occur without being considered unethical, but first of all it is not illegal.
Therefore, punishing active alliances in wars because they didn't have a certain amount of players in a single moment seems to me to be inadequate.
I'm a Glory Decay enthusiast, but I've always asked for transparency in the process and parameters. This transparency was denied by the BHG Moderator.
The process needs tweaking and can be improved a lot to make the game better, but mistakes during the process must be fixed.