FERMADRID1976
New member
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2024
- Messages
- 1
I suppose there will be countless opinions, but which is the best selection of 3 generals and why?
Thanks for the help
Thanks for the help
Churchill is the first "Well gosh, this is a good General, think I'll focus on him; and people won't make fun of me in the future." general and available at Global Age.And which generals are good pre-space age, besides for Hannibal?
So what's my 3rd general besides Hannibal and Churchill?Churchill is the first "Well gosh, this is a good General, think I'll focus on him; and people won't make fun of me in the future." general and available at Global Age.
I agree it is not worth bringing the other to high levels. Its just because someone asked for pre space age generals, and there Napoleon and Churchill are the best IMO.I agree with 1 to 4.
But I wouldn't upgrade other generals. Instead, save your time; upgrade your troops, planes, tactics; avoid the unnecessary XP (war weight).
Level up, unlock generals 1-4 and upgrade only those.
For attack I use Zhukov, Sun tzu, and the third depends on the base I’m hitting. If I need a gen to take the target of the silo then I’ll use Hannibal over his high hp. If I’m not worried about the silo I’ll use Petra. On defense I use Napoleon, Churchill, Sun tzu and Zhukov. I have the fourth in the pentagon. So the generals I have I’ve maxed out Zhukov and Sun tzu to 110. Also my other 2 ( chosen defending generals) Churchill and Napoleon. Petra and Hannibal I’ve kept at 109 so they don’t show up on defense. Some generals work a bit better on defense than attack. Being able to shoot over walls. Not be able to get through walls. Petra on defense is normally the first to dieI suppose there will be countless opinions, but which is the best selection of 3 generals and why?
Thanks for the help
When defending you would have to include Petra Herrera simply due to speed and the way attackers can be slowed down.And for defense? The same? I have Alexander, Joan of arc and Hannibal as defensive player..
Have to disagree with you there. In my experience Petra is useless on defense. He gets to attacker deployment zone too quick and dies before any back up is there. Especially since they made such a large zone to activate the gens from fort.When defending you would have to include Petra Herrera simply due to speed and the way attackers can be slowed down.
Isn't Petra the only general who suppresses the enemy much like machine gunners do? To me as an attacker it's probably the most annoying general due to this.In my experience Petra is useless on defense.
Once he spawns he’s too fast to the enemy. If Petra was a little bit slower Petra would be better for defense. On attack Petra works well for the mbt forrest defenders and incoming hoards etc. a lot of times it comes down to how and when you deploy on offenseIsn't Petra the only general who suppresses the enemy much like machine gunners do? To me as an attacker it's probably the most annoying general due to this.
To be honest I rarely deploy Petra when attacking but I thought that this general's high speed was a bonus when defending as attackers would be taken on more quickly, and because of this stalled early on?Once he spawns he’s too fast to the enemy. If Petra was a little bit slower Petra would be better for defense. On attack Petra works well for the mbt forrest defenders and incoming hoards etc. a lot of times it comes down to how and when you deploy on offense