FroggyKilla
Approved user
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2015
- Messages
- 550
Why would bombers need the suppression effect if they’ve already trashed the defenses outright?
To be fair Gavin, are you talking about fighters in general or maxed fighters?Fighters are OP. They shouldn’t be better in almost every way over bombers.
They cost less, have more hp, use up one slot, deal more damage to buildings then they should, faster speed, slow down buildings and have an area attack on troops.
Remove the slow from the fighters and give it to the bombers and reduce the damage the fighters deal to buildings.
Yes, but bombers still need chaff!I couldn't imagine any rebalance that would have these two units stray too far from their current relationship to one another. A lot of smart folks have pointed out the pros and cons of each role these planes cover, as well as their historical context.
Yes, but bombers still need chaff!
Also, while we're on the subject, any reason why my bomber post in the Ideas section was redirected to the Forum Rules section?