Fighters rebalance. Why do you want killing the game ?

[arno78]

75% of my allies use(d) Fighters and spent hundreds € to have Fighters artefacts. Now they (fighters) are completely useless whatever museum we have like -85% dps/hp defensive towers AND +100% dps/health Fighters. Not talking about € spent to optimize artefacts as well.
The rebalance you made with fighters has the direct consequence that players using Fighters don't want to play the game anymore.
From a WW perspective, I'm guessing at least 60% of people used Fighters, and we have all the same feeling. Enough is Enough . Did your team try to play with Fighters before imposing this sheety rebalance ? I'm sure not
Players fighting with fighters, please put a thumb up to this post or react for this rebalance to be changed as this is just having contempt of 60% of early players using planes.
BHG, don't dream we won't buy artefacts for transporters. You say you listen to players, then act. Errors can happen, but this one is so massive, I wouldn't like to be in the shoes of the guy who took this f****** decision.
I've played the game for what 12-13 years now, dont remember, I'm max everywhere and I have nothing to do apart WW where my planes are useless, you are shooting yourself in the foot..
Not even talking about next age which doesn't come.
But I understand it, you make changes to fights, people don't like that , then they don't buy anything, then you don't have enough money to hire developers , then next age is delayed. But then you loose players... Fact to be bought by another company will make you sink I'm sure

 

[Shaymanbob]

I,ve played and spent money since 2015, I had to reorganise when you introduced missile silos, I had to reorganise when you nerfed attack helicopters, and now you have nerfed fighters I am not going to reorganise, I have quit the game and you have lost my money.

 

[Roccom]

Même sentiment que vous les amis, je ne dépenserai plus un € pour ce jeu, je me suis fait avoir une fois mais pas 2 fois. Ce nerf sur les combattants est totalement stupide et incohérent, mais comme les développeurs du jeu , ne jouent pas eux .ils peuvent pas comprendre l’érreur qu’ils ont faite. Seul les défenseurs de bas niveau seront satisfaits de ce nerf . Tout comme augmenter les dégâts de démolition est aussi stupide . Le jeu part en sucette et c’est pas très rassurant pour l’avenir

 

[Archius]

My team lost our best WW players because of the fighter nerfing. They still log in the game every now and then, but are no longer interested in World Wars.

I've never understood the thrill of extremely strong defense. I'm at level 476 and my base hasn't been defeated in months. And I haven't even used the bastions effectively. They are just left on the edges of my base.

 

[The Jack]

If you think by reducing the length of time protect is active on both attack and defense you‘ve rebalanced anything, you are wrong once again. Nobody uses all protect war tactics. You have to use a combination of war tactics during attacks. So while you’re attacking, you get one, maybe two uses of protect tactic while your troops are still grouped. After the battle progresses, your troops get spread out. It’s not practical at the higher levels to think you can clear a base in the time given by trying to keep your detachments grouped together using rally. They wander in different directions while the timer is on cool down. In the mean time, an endless amount of troops, mostly tanks at higher levels, continuously spawn, over and over, all launching with protect. This is in no way fair to the attacker. Reducing it by a few seconds won’t matter. They quickly whittle down attacking troops, even with transports dropping paratroops. The attackers are just simply overrun by tanks, that are still spawning with protect. Defensive troops shouldn’t get anymore than a single spawn with protect, period! And that‘s probably overpowered. As a previous poster stated, his base hasn’t been defeated in months. You have no reasonable level cap, if any. This has created a massive imbalance from drone to auto age, and even within auto age itself. The higher level the base is, the more buildings are maxed hp’s. They deal max damage and can be crazy buffed with coalitions.

If you people actually play this game, you have made it extremely favored to defensive bases. In no way should a digital age base be able to defend against an auto age attacker. That’ how badly imbalanced the game is. Every time you make a slight buff for attackers, you give something more to defenders. Thanks not balancing.

Why are there two museums? How about one? Answer: this is just another way to get people to chase artifacts by paying more money, with no guarantee of actually getting the artifact, LOL. I might actually spend more money (I’ve spent very little) if I knew I would get an artifact for a set price.

Why more councilors and artifacts that are almost impossible to acquire?
What does the library research for the attack helos x1 damage mean exactly?? 1x1 =1. Is there a damage increase?
How can Ai be so bad that a defending troop can sit right in the middle of mortarman, whose preferred target is defenders, and hack away at them without the mortarman reacting to the attack? If an attacker shoots at a defender, the defending troops immediately retaliate.
Why is the debuff cap maxed at 85% when the buff cap has no max? If I have +85% to enemy defender spawn rate, and they have +120% to defender spawn rate, they’re still spawning troops/tanks 35% faster, and all with protect.
Why do towers shoot at aircraft?? And with extreme accuracy because they never miss. Let’s see, we have anti aircraft batteries, towers, machine gun towers that suppress aircraft damage, missile silo, SAM’s, and CGI radar that all attack aircraft! And now you’ve nerfed fighters,LOL.
Ai so bad that I can try and redirect a rally to a certain building or spot and my attacker will sit at one spot shooting at the wall while there’s an opening one space away, but all defenders easily find the nearest open, approach my attacking troops, start shooting it, and my attacking troops keeps attacking the wall in the same spot until he’s dead. And, I lost my healer cart too because it randomly decided to drive over there and get picked off……….
The ”tournament system” is a whole other topic. Ok, now you’ve made it where people can’t intentionally drop down a tier. But did you ever give any thought to how you set up the whole point system? Tournaments are equal matches between equal opponents.However, your algorithm does not match up that way. So we are constantly going two steps forward, and two steps back. NO Progress! Because the matches are so randomly matched, you SHOULD NOT LOSE POINTS when you lose the battle. You should be rewarded less points than the winner. This make the system more fair and allows all alliances to progress. It’s really pointless right now and we can’t even opt out of participation. THAT IS WHAT NEEDS TO CHANGE FOR TOURNAMENTS!

You can’t possibly be this ridiculous? Have you ever thought that by creating more and more stuff that you’re making the game worse?? You keep digging the hole deeper and will lose more players with every “update and rebalance”.
I’m not even going to get into the horrendous build/upgrade/research times that make no sense whatsoever…..ll

 

[Seek]

Dude do you even play? 1 Demo to 2 demo per AA offense can walk in every base.

There is no balance there is no reason to even play defense right now.

Trust when I say any reductions they gave fighters is nothing compared to what they have done to defense.

BHG bring out next update now or something a month of pure Offense in the game is bullcrap

 

[King Crimson]

Dude do you even play? 1 Demo to 2 demo per AA offense can walk in every base.

There is no balance there is no reason to even play defense right now.

Trust when I say any reductions they gave fighters is nothing compared to what they have done to defense.

BHG bring out next update now or something a month of pure Offense in the game is bullcrap

Give bhg time to see the effects of their changes and they'll probably scale them back. I think 3-4 yrs should do it - if they new owners haven't retired by then.