DomiNations Update 13.2 - Combat Rebalance Pt. 3

Nikolay · Dec 10, 2025

Error 420 has been appearing much more frequently than before, sometimes right in the middle of battle. Freezing and crashing during World War battles. Frequent crashes when opening the Citadel. Another unstable update.

King Crimson · Dec 10, 2025

Apophis said:
Warning attackers: From this moment on, it’s 100% your own fault if you keep investing in Transports and Paras – the grace period is officially over.

One defender already went crying on the forum, and BHG has started “researching” what Paratroopers actually are. Behind the scenes they’re already cooking up a nerf and dressing it up as a “balance adjustment” for Transports/Paratroopers.

Remember this version number: that nerf is being lined up for update 14.2 – anyone still dumping resources into this combo now has no right to complain later, only to blame themselves.

I was told paras are getting an unexpected buff from infantry boosts so it won't be a nerf per se

SPUUUU9 · Dec 10, 2025

Is there a new mythical artifact for the t34 panzer Motor coming and the Gemini Helm? I See some New picture in the showcase... And Alfred jewel legendär and mythical as well... I missed the announcement... Any Stats for that (afred jewel is in the post but for the other two...?)

Kawasaki_Ninja · Dec 10, 2025

Everyone’s so damn noisy. You’re just making excuses, saying the attacking units are strong when in reality your own base is underdeveloped and weak.

Because you keep making a fuss, the units get nerfed one after another. You’re being a nuisance.

Of course paratroopers are stronger than usual—they’re boosted by artifacts, councilors, and ammunition.

Don’t complain about not being able to win until you’ve prepared defensive artifacts, councilors, defensive facilities, and 20 ammo.

Seek · Dec 10, 2025

First off Bombers are not dead just slower.

Second mortar kill quick already and para have been killing bases without deploying for a while now. I still do not recommend any nerf to either

Give this current update time before passing judgement. It is also not fair to keep nerfing troop combo when a fix can be had by boosting something’s on defense ie coals, making useful defense drone , increase effects of slowing traps and mg towers etc etc This better option then continuing nerf troop combos and going forward release the new meta with its counter get profits from both sides at once. Something had to be done with Bombers nerf is what it is. Going forward think of boosting otherside instead of nerfs.

Now with all this said If you are unhappy with game Leave, Step Away, and your welcome back when game play is more to your liking. This was advice defenders got….

Gnarvash · Dec 10, 2025

King Crimson said:
I was told paras are getting an unexpected buff from infantry boosts so it won't be a nerf per se

Yeah. I agree with you. Some people seem to confuse fix with nerf.

Major1 · Dec 10, 2025

To everyone piling on me personally — Seek, Archius, and the rest of the “talk first, test never” crowd — let’s clear something up right now.

You didn’t refute me. You dodged. You threw insults, you made assumptions, and you kept repeating the same defender narrative with zero proof. Calling me “amateur,” telling me I’m delusional, or trying to belittle my experience doesn’t magically make your argument true. It just shows you don’t have one.

Here are the facts you keep ignoring:

I run three Robotics bases.
One of them has been a defensive base for years. It has NOT been a free 5-star buffet. Out of hundreds of hits in the last couple of years, I’ve had maybe around twenty 5-stars on that base total — and not a single one of those was from bombers. I rechecked the history. Repeatedly.

So when you sit there saying “bombers were clearing top defenders in 1:15,” what you really mean is: some defenders were getting erased because their bases weren’t built to defend or they never adapted. That isn’t a game-wide truth. That’s your personal weakness dressed up as “balance.”

And on offense?
My other two bases are offensive accounts. I’m 5-starring most of what I hit. In Aliens war, even my LOWEST account is sitting around 14–15 in 20-man wars and still gets assigned top-5 targets — and I’m clearing them. My top defensive account takes top-two assignments.

So don’t talk to me like I don’t know how offense works. I’m living in the top wars every week on both sides of the game.

Now let’s go point-by-point on the nonsense you threw at me:

1) “Bombers were OP and unstoppable.”
No. Bombers were a viable air strategy that required proper museum and skill. Most people using bombers weren’t even 5-starring consistently — and the top results you’re crying about were elite players doing elite player things. Your answer to that was not “learn counters,” not “fix stacking,” not “buff defense tools.”
Your answer was: whine until BHG deletes the strategy.

2) “You’re just mad because your crutch got nerfed.”
Wrong again. I’m mad because this game keeps selling power, then deleting it.
That isn’t “rebalance.” That’s bait-and-switch game design.

3) “If attackers don’t like it, they should leave.”
That line is exactly why people don’t respect you. It’s childish and it’s toxic.
And it’s even worse when it’s coming from a dev team or repeated like gospel. You don’t build a long-term competitive game by telling paying customers to quit. You build a dead game that only whales and abandoned bases remain in.

4) “Wait now, let the update settle.”
This is the most dishonest argument in the whole thread.
We’ve seen this movie a dozen times. It goes like this:

Defenders cry about a troop combo.
BHG nerfs it.
Your side says “wait, stop talking about nerfs for now.”
Two months later you come back with a new target: “Ok now nerf mortars.”
Then paras/transports.
Then the next thing that beats your base.
Endless treadmill.

And page 7 is already proving it. The next nerf campaign is literally being loaded in real time: paras/transports, mortars, whatever else defenders can’t stop. So don’t sell me “patience” when what you really want is a cooldown before your next demand.

Now to BHG directly:

You are destroying trust with your playerbase.
People aren’t upset because one unit got tuned. They’re upset because you take money for a strategy, then gut it after the purchase.

Players spent crowns, tokens, and real cash on bomber artifacts and upgrades — especially mythicals designed specifically to enhance bombers. Many of them saved resources for months or paid money to compete. Then you cap the bonuses and wipe out the value. That is not a small adjustment. That is functionally rendering paid items useless after purchase.

Call it whatever corporate word you want. Players feel what it is:
We paid for something you sold us as valuable, then you removed the value.

You want to keep rebalancing? Fine.
But then you need to do at least one of these, and frankly you should do all three:

Stop gutting offense because of defender whining.
Balance by adding real defensive counters and limiting bonus stacking — not by deleting entire troop classes every time top players find a way to win.
Guarantee multiple viable attack paths.
A strategy game where only one land spam meta survives is not a strategy game. It’s a chore.
Compensate players when you nerf paid power.
Offer refunds, token buybacks, artifact sell-backs, or conversion options. If you don’t, you’re basically telling your customers:
“Pay today, we might delete it tomorrow.”

And yes, since people want to pretend this is purely “game talk,” let me spell out the real-world part:

When a company repeatedly sells digital items or boosts for real currency, markets them as valuable, and then knowingly devalues them after purchase without compensation, that is exactly the kind of behavior that gets examined under consumer-protection and false-advertising laws in many places.

I’m not threatening fairy-tale nonsense. I’m saying plainly:
if this pattern continues, players have legitimate grounds to explore legal action or formal consumer complaints.

You don’t get to take money for power and then erase that power whenever defenders scream loud enough. That’s not “live balancing.” That’s a business practice problem.

So here’s my final message to both sides:

To the defenders attacking me personally: you don’t get to replace evidence with insults. If you want to debate balance, bring real replays and data, not arrogance and dogpiling.
To BHG: stop running this game on a nerf treadmill that punishes paying attackers. Either build counters and cap stacking like a real strategy game, or refund people when you delete what they bought.

Because right now, what you’re doing isn’t balance.
It’s killing the attacker base, killing trust, and pushing your own customers toward the exit.

And that’s the truth no matter how many insults you throw.

The Jack · Dec 10, 2025

Seek said:
Here is clue when something is unstoppable by defenders leaving them zero chance it’s going get a nerfed in some way.

Anyone that has been reading the forums knew a nerf or change to bombers was coming . @Harlems369th was even kind enough to send a warning shot video of the bombers ..
***Note This was Handled Better Than Attack Helicopter or Fighter nerfs which came with zero warnings just saying

My gut says bombers will still be useful and a mainstay for allot of attacker just might take 2:15 instead of 1:15 currently to 5 star a top defender.

Folks I call out BHG all the time, but this time they gave multiple warnings and anyone reading forums at all knew this was coming.

There should be zero buyers remorse for those that bought Spitfire Mythical you knew a change was coming and it still a very powerful useful Mythical. Way better than defenders have gotten.

Please direct me to the post by Harlem that said bombers were getting nerfed, before July. Because that’s when the mythical became available. I’m not talking about all your complaining about bombers being OP. But I guess if I’m to read the tea leaves or read the minds of the Devs, then all I have to do is see what you defenders are complaining about next to see what nerf is coming.

The Jack · Dec 10, 2025

Major1 said:
To everyone piling on me personally — Seek, Archius, and the rest of the “talk first, test never” crowd — let’s clear something up right now.

You didn’t refute me. You dodged. You threw insults, you made assumptions, and you kept repeating the same defender narrative with zero proof. Calling me “amateur,” telling me I’m delusional, or trying to belittle my experience doesn’t magically make your argument true. It just shows you don’t have one.

Here are the facts you keep ignoring:

I run three Robotics bases.
One of them has been a defensive base for years. It has NOT been a free 5-star buffet. Out of hundreds of hits in the last couple of years, I’ve had maybe around twenty 5-stars on that base total — and not a single one of those was from bombers. I rechecked the history. Repeatedly.

So when you sit there saying “bombers were clearing top defenders in 1:15,” what you really mean is: some defenders were getting erased because their bases weren’t built to defend or they never adapted. That isn’t a game-wide truth. That’s your personal weakness dressed up as “balance.”

And on offense?
My other two bases are offensive accounts. I’m 5-starring most of what I hit. In Aliens war, even my LOWEST account is sitting around 14–15 in 20-man wars and still gets assigned top-5 targets — and I’m clearing them. My top defensive account takes top-two assignments.

So don’t talk to me like I don’t know how offense works. I’m living in the top wars every week on both sides of the game.

Now let’s go point-by-point on the nonsense you threw at me:

1) “Bombers were OP and unstoppable.”
No. Bombers were a viable air strategy that required proper museum and skill. Most people using bombers weren’t even 5-starring consistently — and the top results you’re crying about were elite players doing elite player things. Your answer to that was not “learn counters,” not “fix stacking,” not “buff defense tools.”
Your answer was: whine until BHG deletes the strategy.

2) “You’re just mad because your crutch got nerfed.”
Wrong again. I’m mad because this game keeps selling power, then deleting it.
That isn’t “rebalance.” That’s bait-and-switch game design.

3) “If attackers don’t like it, they should leave.”
That line is exactly why people don’t respect you. It’s childish and it’s toxic.
And it’s even worse when it’s coming from a dev team or repeated like gospel. You don’t build a long-term competitive game by telling paying customers to quit. You build a dead game that only whales and abandoned bases remain in.

4) “Wait now, let the update settle.”
This is the most dishonest argument in the whole thread.
We’ve seen this movie a dozen times. It goes like this:

Defenders cry about a troop combo.

BHG nerfs it.

Your side says “wait, stop talking about nerfs for now.”

Two months later you come back with a new target: “Ok now nerf mortars.”

Then paras/transports.

Then the next thing that beats your base.
Endless treadmill.

And page 7 is already proving it. The next nerf campaign is literally being loaded in real time: paras/transports, mortars, whatever else defenders can’t stop. So don’t sell me “patience” when what you really want is a cooldown before your next demand.

Now to BHG directly:

You are destroying trust with your playerbase.
People aren’t upset because one unit got tuned. They’re upset because you take money for a strategy, then gut it after the purchase.

Players spent crowns, tokens, and real cash on bomber artifacts and upgrades — especially mythicals designed specifically to enhance bombers. Many of them saved resources for months or paid money to compete. Then you cap the bonuses and wipe out the value. That is not a small adjustment. That is functionally rendering paid items useless after purchase.

Call it whatever corporate word you want. Players feel what it is:
We paid for something you sold us as valuable, then you removed the value.

You want to keep rebalancing? Fine.
But then you need to do at least one of these, and frankly you should do all three:

Stop gutting offense because of defender whining.
Balance by adding real defensive counters and limiting bonus stacking — not by deleting entire troop classes every time top players find a way to win.

Guarantee multiple viable attack paths.
A strategy game where only one land spam meta survives is not a strategy game. It’s a chore.

Compensate players when you nerf paid power.
Offer refunds, token buybacks, artifact sell-backs, or conversion options. If you don’t, you’re basically telling your customers:
“Pay today, we might delete it tomorrow.”

And yes, since people want to pretend this is purely “game talk,” let me spell out the real-world part:

When a company repeatedly sells digital items or boosts for real currency, markets them as valuable, and then knowingly devalues them after purchase without compensation, that is exactly the kind of behavior that gets examined under consumer-protection and false-advertising laws in many places.

I’m not threatening fairy-tale nonsense. I’m saying plainly:
if this pattern continues, players have legitimate grounds to explore legal action or formal consumer complaints.

You don’t get to take money for power and then erase that power whenever defenders scream loud enough. That’s not “live balancing.” That’s a business practice problem.

So here’s my final message to both sides:

To the defenders attacking me personally: you don’t get to replace evidence with insults. If you want to debate balance, bring real replays and data, not arrogance and dogpiling.

To BHG: stop running this game on a nerf treadmill that punishes paying attackers. Either build counters and cap stacking like a real strategy game, or refund people when you delete what they bought.

Because right now, what you’re doing isn’t balance.
It’s killing the attacker base, killing trust, and pushing your own customers toward the exit.

And that’s the truth no matter how many insults you throw.

This is a well thought out and articulate post. I hope Harlem reads it, although I doubt he responds. In short, I want my 1k tokens back. After testing the bomber nerf, it’s worse than I even imagined, especially for lower level bases. Ridiculous

King Crimson · Dec 11, 2025

Major1 said:
To everyone piling on me personally — Seek, Archius, and the rest of the “talk first, test never” crowd — let’s clear something up right now.

You didn’t refute me. You dodged. You threw insults, you made assumptions, and you kept repeating the same defender narrative with zero proof. Calling me “amateur,” telling me I’m delusional, or trying to belittle my experience doesn’t magically make your argument true. It just shows you don’t have one.

Here are the facts you keep ignoring:

I run three Robotics bases.
One of them has been a defensive base for years. It has NOT been a free 5-star buffet. Out of hundreds of hits in the last couple of years, I’ve had maybe around twenty 5-stars on that base total — and not a single one of those was from bombers. I rechecked the history. Repeatedly.

So when you sit there saying “bombers were clearing top defenders in 1:15,” what you really mean is: some defenders were getting erased because their bases weren’t built to defend or they never adapted. That isn’t a game-wide truth. That’s your personal weakness dressed up as “balance.”

And on offense?
My other two bases are offensive accounts. I’m 5-starring most of what I hit. In Aliens war, even my LOWEST account is sitting around 14–15 in 20-man wars and still gets assigned top-5 targets — and I’m clearing them. My top defensive account takes top-two assignments.

So don’t talk to me like I don’t know how offense works. I’m living in the top wars every week on both sides of the game.

Now let’s go point-by-point on the nonsense you threw at me:

1) “Bombers were OP and unstoppable.”
No. Bombers were a viable air strategy that required proper museum and skill. Most people using bombers weren’t even 5-starring consistently — and the top results you’re crying about were elite players doing elite player things. Your answer to that was not “learn counters,” not “fix stacking,” not “buff defense tools.”
Your answer was: whine until BHG deletes the strategy.

2) “You’re just mad because your crutch got nerfed.”
Wrong again. I’m mad because this game keeps selling power, then deleting it.
That isn’t “rebalance.” That’s bait-and-switch game design.

3) “If attackers don’t like it, they should leave.”
That line is exactly why people don’t respect you. It’s childish and it’s toxic.
And it’s even worse when it’s coming from a dev team or repeated like gospel. You don’t build a long-term competitive game by telling paying customers to quit. You build a dead game that only whales and abandoned bases remain in.

4) “Wait now, let the update settle.”
This is the most dishonest argument in the whole thread.
We’ve seen this movie a dozen times. It goes like this:

Defenders cry about a troop combo.

BHG nerfs it.

Your side says “wait, stop talking about nerfs for now.”

Two months later you come back with a new target: “Ok now nerf mortars.”

Then paras/transports.

Then the next thing that beats your base.
Endless treadmill.

And page 7 is already proving it. The next nerf campaign is literally being loaded in real time: paras/transports, mortars, whatever else defenders can’t stop. So don’t sell me “patience” when what you really want is a cooldown before your next demand.

Now to BHG directly:

You are destroying trust with your playerbase.
People aren’t upset because one unit got tuned. They’re upset because you take money for a strategy, then gut it after the purchase.

Players spent crowns, tokens, and real cash on bomber artifacts and upgrades — especially mythicals designed specifically to enhance bombers. Many of them saved resources for months or paid money to compete. Then you cap the bonuses and wipe out the value. That is not a small adjustment. That is functionally rendering paid items useless after purchase.

Call it whatever corporate word you want. Players feel what it is:
We paid for something you sold us as valuable, then you removed the value.

You want to keep rebalancing? Fine.
But then you need to do at least one of these, and frankly you should do all three:

Stop gutting offense because of defender whining.
Balance by adding real defensive counters and limiting bonus stacking — not by deleting entire troop classes every time top players find a way to win.

Guarantee multiple viable attack paths.
A strategy game where only one land spam meta survives is not a strategy game. It’s a chore.

Compensate players when you nerf paid power.
Offer refunds, token buybacks, artifact sell-backs, or conversion options. If you don’t, you’re basically telling your customers:
“Pay today, we might delete it tomorrow.”

And yes, since people want to pretend this is purely “game talk,” let me spell out the real-world part:

When a company repeatedly sells digital items or boosts for real currency, markets them as valuable, and then knowingly devalues them after purchase without compensation, that is exactly the kind of behavior that gets examined under consumer-protection and false-advertising laws in many places.

I’m not threatening fairy-tale nonsense. I’m saying plainly:
if this pattern continues, players have legitimate grounds to explore legal action or formal consumer complaints.

You don’t get to take money for power and then erase that power whenever defenders scream loud enough. That’s not “live balancing.” That’s a business practice problem.

So here’s my final message to both sides:

To the defenders attacking me personally: you don’t get to replace evidence with insults. If you want to debate balance, bring real replays and data, not arrogance and dogpiling.

To BHG: stop running this game on a nerf treadmill that punishes paying attackers. Either build counters and cap stacking like a real strategy game, or refund people when you delete what they bought.

Because right now, what you’re doing isn’t balance.
It’s killing the attacker base, killing trust, and pushing your own customers toward the exit.

And that’s the truth no matter how many insults you throw.

TL, did read. Well said.
The bait n switch will never go away because the minority of whales will always give the devs an unofficial stamp of approval with each monthly purchase.
And I'm guessing no one's reporting this company ...
The "if the game's not to your liking" advice from the dev is just the typical lack of respect from this company - a real 'head up your arse' comment.

Seek · Dec 11, 2025

Major1 said:
To everyone piling on me personally — Seek, Archius, and the rest of the “talk first, test never” crowd — let’s clear something up right now.

You didn’t refute me. You dodged. You threw insults, you made assumptions, and you kept repeating the same defender narrative with zero proof. Calling me “amateur,” telling me I’m delusional, or trying to belittle my experience doesn’t magically make your argument true. It just shows you don’t have one.

Here are the facts you keep ignoring:

I run three Robotics bases.
One of them has been a defensive base for years. It has NOT been a free 5-star buffet. Out of hundreds of hits in the last couple of years, I’ve had maybe around twenty 5-stars on that base total — and not a single one of those was from bombers. I rechecked the history. Repeatedly.

So when you sit there saying “bombers were clearing top defenders in 1:15,” what you really mean is: some defenders were getting erased because their bases weren’t built to defend or they never adapted. That isn’t a game-wide truth. That’s your personal weakness dressed up as “balance.”

And on offense?
My other two bases are offensive accounts. I’m 5-starring most of what I hit. In Aliens war, even my LOWEST account is sitting around 14–15 in 20-man wars and still gets assigned top-5 targets — and I’m clearing them. My top defensive account takes top-two assignments.

So don’t talk to me like I don’t know how offense works. I’m living in the top wars every week on both sides of the game.

Now let’s go point-by-point on the nonsense you threw at me:

1) “Bombers were OP and unstoppable.”
No. Bombers were a viable air strategy that required proper museum and skill. Most people using bombers weren’t even 5-starring consistently — and the top results you’re crying about were elite players doing elite player things. Your answer to that was not “learn counters,” not “fix stacking,” not “buff defense tools.”
Your answer was: whine until BHG deletes the strategy.

2) “You’re just mad because your crutch got nerfed.”
Wrong again. I’m mad because this game keeps selling power, then deleting it.
That isn’t “rebalance.” That’s bait-and-switch game design.

3) “If attackers don’t like it, they should leave.”
That line is exactly why people don’t respect you. It’s childish and it’s toxic.
And it’s even worse when it’s coming from a dev team or repeated like gospel. You don’t build a long-term competitive game by telling paying customers to quit. You build a dead game that only whales and abandoned bases remain in.

4) “Wait now, let the update settle.”
This is the most dishonest argument in the whole thread.
We’ve seen this movie a dozen times. It goes like this:

Defenders cry about a troop combo.

BHG nerfs it.

Your side says “wait, stop talking about nerfs for now.”

Two months later you come back with a new target: “Ok now nerf mortars.”

Then paras/transports.

Then the next thing that beats your base.
Endless treadmill.

And page 7 is already proving it. The next nerf campaign is literally being loaded in real time: paras/transports, mortars, whatever else defenders can’t stop. So don’t sell me “patience” when what you really want is a cooldown before your next demand.

Now to BHG directly:

You are destroying trust with your playerbase.
People aren’t upset because one unit got tuned. They’re upset because you take money for a strategy, then gut it after the purchase.

Players spent crowns, tokens, and real cash on bomber artifacts and upgrades — especially mythicals designed specifically to enhance bombers. Many of them saved resources for months or paid money to compete. Then you cap the bonuses and wipe out the value. That is not a small adjustment. That is functionally rendering paid items useless after purchase.

Call it whatever corporate word you want. Players feel what it is:
We paid for something you sold us as valuable, then you removed the value.

You want to keep rebalancing? Fine.
But then you need to do at least one of these, and frankly you should do all three:

Stop gutting offense because of defender whining.
Balance by adding real defensive counters and limiting bonus stacking — not by deleting entire troop classes every time top players find a way to win.

Guarantee multiple viable attack paths.
A strategy game where only one land spam meta survives is not a strategy game. It’s a chore.

Compensate players when you nerf paid power.
Offer refunds, token buybacks, artifact sell-backs, or conversion options. If you don’t, you’re basically telling your customers:
“Pay today, we might delete it tomorrow.”

And yes, since people want to pretend this is purely “game talk,” let me spell out the real-world part:

When a company repeatedly sells digital items or boosts for real currency, markets them as valuable, and then knowingly devalues them after purchase without compensation, that is exactly the kind of behavior that gets examined under consumer-protection and false-advertising laws in many places.

I’m not threatening fairy-tale nonsense. I’m saying plainly:
if this pattern continues, players have legitimate grounds to explore legal action or formal consumer complaints.

You don’t get to take money for power and then erase that power whenever defenders scream loud enough. That’s not “live balancing.” That’s a business practice problem.

So here’s my final message to both sides:

To the defenders attacking me personally: you don’t get to replace evidence with insults. If you want to debate balance, bring real replays and data, not arrogance and dogpiling.

To BHG: stop running this game on a nerf treadmill that punishes paying attackers. Either build counters and cap stacking like a real strategy game, or refund people when you delete what they bought.

Because right now, what you’re doing isn’t balance.
It’s killing the attacker base, killing trust, and pushing your own customers toward the exit.

And that’s the truth no matter how many insults you throw.

Well there Major1 lol again if you do not like the current state of game then you can leave and return when game is more to your style of play.

Well since this was advice BHG Staff gave to all defenders that voice their displeasure with unstoppable Bomber. It is good enough for offense players. ( I am not naming Staff that told me and other defenders above statement out of respect for them and best advice I been given that I am gladly sharing with O players)

As for arguments that we need to work on our end lol Well most the defenders that complain were from top alliance and end game players. Here is just clue for ya since you are my number 1 fan.
1. Air Defense Tower = demo took them all out before first Bomber strife if not Demo then it was commando’s and tact helicopter.
2. Silo destroyed before first troop hit ground
3. Each strife run by Bombers and Turps take entire side of base we are talking maxed out buildings and towers

I can continue on and on to counter everything you brought up but it is pointless. Remember we did not call you out till you Sir started throwing insults our way. If you live in glass house do not throw stones.

I agree it sucks having stuff devalued such as troop combos. Yet again something had to be done. Was nerfing the only answer? That was decided by BHG not Seek or any defense player.

As for the little legal action bluff, do it you will waste money and time. BHG is not stupid and have lawyers too that review stuff before they do it. Plus it is Karen move to even bring that up in my eyes. Do it ! Don’t talk it ! You will lose !

I do not mind the hate, the insults and saying my defense sucks etc . I have thick skin and when those opinions are coming from lesser players I find even more funny.

Now with all this said you sir have a great holiday season and remember game is just pixels not real life and if game went away today I still hope you have a great life even if your pixel god Bombers got nerfed. Maybe Santa will bring you best gift a Clue. Enjoy your game bro even if your not pixel god it is still fun . If ya actually practice Bomber still work on killing 3 D bases your time would be better spent on that then being angry at Seek and rest of defenders.

Der BabyHund · Dec 11, 2025

Major1 said:
To everyone piling on me personally — Seek, Archius, and the rest of the “talk first, test never” crowd — let’s clear something up right now.

You didn’t refute me. You dodged. You threw insults, you made assumptions, and you kept repeating the same defender narrative with zero proof. Calling me “amateur,” telling me I’m delusional, or trying to belittle my experience doesn’t magically make your argument true. It just shows you don’t have one.

Here are the facts you keep ignoring:

I run three Robotics bases.
One of them has been a defensive base for years. It has NOT been a free 5-star buffet. Out of hundreds of hits in the last couple of years, I’ve had maybe around twenty 5-stars on that base total — and not a single one of those was from bombers. I rechecked the history. Repeatedly.

So when you sit there saying “bombers were clearing top defenders in 1:15,” what you really mean is: some defenders were getting erased because their bases weren’t built to defend or they never adapted. That isn’t a game-wide truth. That’s your personal weakness dressed up as “balance.”

And on offense?
My other two bases are offensive accounts. I’m 5-starring most of what I hit. In Aliens war, even my LOWEST account is sitting around 14–15 in 20-man wars and still gets assigned top-5 targets — and I’m clearing them. My top defensive account takes top-two assignments.

So don’t talk to me like I don’t know how offense works. I’m living in the top wars every week on both sides of the game.

Now let’s go point-by-point on the nonsense you threw at me:

1) “Bombers were OP and unstoppable.”
No. Bombers were a viable air strategy that required proper museum and skill. Most people using bombers weren’t even 5-starring consistently — and the top results you’re crying about were elite players doing elite player things. Your answer to that was not “learn counters,” not “fix stacking,” not “buff defense tools.”
Your answer was: whine until BHG deletes the strategy.

2) “You’re just mad because your crutch got nerfed.”
Wrong again. I’m mad because this game keeps selling power, then deleting it.
That isn’t “rebalance.” That’s bait-and-switch game design.

3) “If attackers don’t like it, they should leave.”
That line is exactly why people don’t respect you. It’s childish and it’s toxic.
And it’s even worse when it’s coming from a dev team or repeated like gospel. You don’t build a long-term competitive game by telling paying customers to quit. You build a dead game that only whales and abandoned bases remain in.

4) “Wait now, let the update settle.”
This is the most dishonest argument in the whole thread.
We’ve seen this movie a dozen times. It goes like this:

Defenders cry about a troop combo.

BHG nerfs it.

Your side says “wait, stop talking about nerfs for now.”

Two months later you come back with a new target: “Ok now nerf mortars.”

Then paras/transports.

Then the next thing that beats your base.
Endless treadmill.

And page 7 is already proving it. The next nerf campaign is literally being loaded in real time: paras/transports, mortars, whatever else defenders can’t stop. So don’t sell me “patience” when what you really want is a cooldown before your next demand.

Now to BHG directly:

You are destroying trust with your playerbase.
People aren’t upset because one unit got tuned. They’re upset because you take money for a strategy, then gut it after the purchase.

Players spent crowns, tokens, and real cash on bomber artifacts and upgrades — especially mythicals designed specifically to enhance bombers. Many of them saved resources for months or paid money to compete. Then you cap the bonuses and wipe out the value. That is not a small adjustment. That is functionally rendering paid items useless after purchase.

Call it whatever corporate word you want. Players feel what it is:
We paid for something you sold us as valuable, then you removed the value.

You want to keep rebalancing? Fine.
But then you need to do at least one of these, and frankly you should do all three:

Stop gutting offense because of defender whining.
Balance by adding real defensive counters and limiting bonus stacking — not by deleting entire troop classes every time top players find a way to win.

Guarantee multiple viable attack paths.
A strategy game where only one land spam meta survives is not a strategy game. It’s a chore.

Compensate players when you nerf paid power.
Offer refunds, token buybacks, artifact sell-backs, or conversion options. If you don’t, you’re basically telling your customers:
“Pay today, we might delete it tomorrow.”

And yes, since people want to pretend this is purely “game talk,” let me spell out the real-world part:

When a company repeatedly sells digital items or boosts for real currency, markets them as valuable, and then knowingly devalues them after purchase without compensation, that is exactly the kind of behavior that gets examined under consumer-protection and false-advertising laws in many places.

I’m not threatening fairy-tale nonsense. I’m saying plainly:
if this pattern continues, players have legitimate grounds to explore legal action or formal consumer complaints.

You don’t get to take money for power and then erase that power whenever defenders scream loud enough. That’s not “live balancing.” That’s a business practice problem.

So here’s my final message to both sides:

To the defenders attacking me personally: you don’t get to replace evidence with insults. If you want to debate balance, bring real replays and data, not arrogance and dogpiling.

To BHG: stop running this game on a nerf treadmill that punishes paying attackers. Either build counters and cap stacking like a real strategy game, or refund people when you delete what they bought.

Because right now, what you’re doing isn’t balance.
It’s killing the attacker base, killing trust, and pushing your own customers toward the exit.

And that’s the truth no matter how many insults you throw.

Very well said and I hope BHG reads the entire comment because it accurately describes the reality of the game at the moment.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, nerfing troops is not rebalancing. Give defenders tools to defend and do not just do the job for them by nerfing every single troop they whine about.

Seek · Dec 11, 2025

Der BabyHund said:
Very well said and I hope BHG reads the entire comment because it accurately describes the reality of the game at the moment.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, nerfing troops is not rebalancing. Give defenders tools to defend and do not just do the job for them by nerfing every single troop they whine about.

I agree nerfing sucks and should been last resort but again BHG saw nerfing as the best option.

Лысый чел · Dec 11, 2025

Seek said:
Ну что ж, Major1, опять же, если тебе не нравится текущее состояние игры, ты можешь уйти и уйти, когда игра будет больше соответствовать твоему стилю.

Итак, поскольку это был совет, который сотрудники BHG давали всем защитникам, выражая ему недовольство неудержимым «Бомбардиром», он вполне подходит и для игроков приступа. (Я не называю имена должностных лиц, которые дали мне другим и защитникам вышеупомянутое заявление, из-за того, что это лучший совет, который я получил и которым с удовольствием делюсь с игроками нынешнего периода).

Что касается аргументов о том, что нам нужно поработать над собой, лол, то большинство защитников, которые жалуются, — это игроки из топовых альянсов и эндгейма. Вот вам подсказка, раз уж вы мой фанат номер 1.
1. Вышки ПВО = подрывники уничтожили их всех до первого бомбардировочного удара, если не подрывники, то спецназовцы и тактические вертолеты.
2. Силосное уничтожение до того, как первый десант высадился на землю.
3. Каждая атака, проводимая бомбардировщиками и турелями, захватывает всю сторону базы, речь идет о максимально улучшенных зданиях и башнях.

Я могу окончательно опровергнуть все ваши утверждения, но это бессмысленно. Помните, мы не критиковали вас, пока вы, сэр, не начали бросаться в наш адрес оскорблениями. Если живешь в стеклянном доме, не бросай камни.

Согласен, это ужасно, когда что-то обесценивается, например, внезапное нападение. Но опять же, что-то нужно было сделать. Было ли ослабленное отношение? Это было решение BHG, а не Seek или кого-либо из игроков, сосредоточивших внимание на защите.

Что касается блефа с кобным иском, то, если вы попытаетесь это сделать, вы зря потратите деньги и время. БХГ не глупо, у них тоже есть юристы, которые всё тщательно проверяют, прежде чем что-либо предпринимать. К тому же, на мой взгляд, даже поднять этот вопрос — это уже перебор. Действуйте! Не говорите об этом! Вы проиграете!

Меня не волнуют ненависть, оскорбления и заявления о том, что моя защита нигде не годится и т.д. У меня толстая кожа, и когда такие мнения исходят от менее опытных игроков, мне это кажется еще смешнее.

Итак, после всего сказанного, желаю вам, сэр, отличных праздников! И помните, игра — это всего лишь пиксели, нереальная жизнь. И даже если бы игра исчезла сегодня, я всё равно желаю вам прекрасной жизни, даже если бы вашего пиксельного бога-бомбардировщика ослабили. Может быть, Санта принесет вам лучший подарок — «Подсказку». Наслаждайтесь игрой, брат, даже если вы не пиксельный бог, она всё равно весёлая. Если вы действительно уверены, что всё равно работаете над уничтожением трёхмерных баз, вам лучше потратить время на это, чем злиться на «Поискателя» и остальных т.

Major1 said:
To everyone piling on me personally — Seek, Archius, and the rest of the “talk first, test never” crowd — let’s clear something up right now.

You didn’t refute me. You dodged. You threw insults, you made assumptions, and you kept repeating the same defender narrative with zero proof. Calling me “amateur,” telling me I’m delusional, or trying to belittle my experience doesn’t magically make your argument true. It just shows you don’t have one.

Here are the facts you keep ignoring:

I run three Robotics bases.
One of them has been a defensive base for years. It has NOT been a free 5-star buffet. Out of hundreds of hits in the last couple of years, I’ve had maybe around twenty 5-stars on that base total — and not a single one of those was from bombers. I rechecked the history. Repeatedly.

So when you sit there saying “bombers were clearing top defenders in 1:15,” what you really mean is: some defenders were getting erased because their bases weren’t built to defend or they never adapted. That isn’t a game-wide truth. That’s your personal weakness dressed up as “balance.”

And on offense?
My other two bases are offensive accounts. I’m 5-starring most of what I hit. In Aliens war, even my LOWEST account is sitting around 14–15 in 20-man wars and still gets assigned top-5 targets — and I’m clearing them. My top defensive account takes top-two assignments.

So don’t talk to me like I don’t know how offense works. I’m living in the top wars every week on both sides of the game.

Now let’s go point-by-point on the nonsense you threw at me:

1) “Bombers were OP and unstoppable.”
No. Bombers were a viable air strategy that required proper museum and skill. Most people using bombers weren’t even 5-starring consistently — and the top results you’re crying about were elite players doing elite player things. Your answer to that was not “learn counters,” not “fix stacking,” not “buff defense tools.”
Your answer was: whine until BHG deletes the strategy.

2) “You’re just mad because your crutch got nerfed.”
Wrong again. I’m mad because this game keeps selling power, then deleting it.
That isn’t “rebalance.” That’s bait-and-switch game design.

3) “If attackers don’t like it, they should leave.”
That line is exactly why people don’t respect you. It’s childish and it’s toxic.
And it’s even worse when it’s coming from a dev team or repeated like gospel. You don’t build a long-term competitive game by telling paying customers to quit. You build a dead game that only whales and abandoned bases remain in.

4) “Wait now, let the update settle.”
This is the most dishonest argument in the whole thread.
We’ve seen this movie a dozen times. It goes like this:

Defenders cry about a troop combo.

BHG nerfs it.

Your side says “wait, stop talking about nerfs for now.”

Two months later you come back with a new target: “Ok now nerf mortars.”

Then paras/transports.

Then the next thing that beats your base.
Endless treadmill.

И страница 7 уже это доказывает. Следующая кампания по ослаблению противника буквально загружается в реальном времени: десантники/транспортники, минометы, всё остальное, что защитники не смогут остановить. Так что не нужно мне «терпение», когда на самом деле вам нужна перезарядка перед следующим требованием.

Теперь перейдем непосредственно к BHG:

Вы подрываете доверие своих игроков.
Люди расстроены не потому, что один экземпляр был настроен неправильно. Они расстроены потому, что вы берете деньги за стратегию, а потом, после покупки, её полностью искажаете.

Игроки тратили короны, жетоны и реальные деньги на артефакты и улучшения для бомбардировщиков — особенно на мифические предметы, специально разработанные для повышения их эффективности. Многие из них копили ресурсы месяцами или платили деньги, чтобы участвовать в соревнованиях. Затем бонусы достигают максимума, и их ценность обнуляется. Это не просто небольшая корректировка. Фактически, это делает платные предметы бесполезными после покупки.

Называйте это как хотите, используя любое корпоративное слово. Игроки чувствуют, что это такое:
Мы заплатили за то, что вы продали нам как ценный товар, а затем вы лишили нас этой ценности.

Вы хотите продолжать проводить перебалансировку? Хорошо.
Но тогда вам нужно сделать хотя бы одно из этих действий, а честно говоря, следует сделать все три:

Прекратите ослаблять нападение из-за нытья защитников.
Сбалансируйте игру, добавив реальные контрмеры в обороне и ограничив суммирование бонусов, а не удаляя целые классы войск каждый раз, когда лучшие игроки находят способ победить.

Гарантируйте наличие нескольких жизнеспособных путей атаки.
Стратегическая игра, в которой выживает только одна мета, основанная на массовом использовании земель, — это не стратегия. Это рутина.

Компенсируйте игрокам потери, когда вы снижаете стоимость платных способностей.
Предлагайте возврат средств, выкуп жетонов, обратную продажу артефактов или варианты конвертации. В противном случае вы фактически говорите своим клиентам:
«Заплатите сегодня, завтра мы можем это удалить».

И да, поскольку люди хотят делать вид, что это чисто «игровые рассуждения», позвольте мне подробнее рассказать о реальной жизни:

Когда компания неоднократно продает цифровые предметы или улучшения за реальные деньги, позиционирует их как ценные, а затем сознательно занижает их стоимость после покупки без компенсации, именно такое поведение во многих странах рассматривается в соответствии с законами о защите прав потребителей и о ложной рекламе.

Я не угрожаю сказочной чепухой. Я говорю прямо:
Если эта тенденция сохранится, у игроков будут законные основания для обращения в суд или подачи официальных жалоб потребителей.

Нельзя брать деньги за электроэнергию, а затем отключать её всякий раз, когда защитники начинают громко кричать. Это не «балансировка в реальном времени». Это проблема деловой практики.

Итак, вот моё заключительное послание обеим сторонам:

Обращаюсь к тем, кто нападает на меня лично: вы не имеете права заменять доказательства оскорблениями. Если вы хотите обсудить баланс, предоставьте реальные повторы и данные, а не высокомерие и травлю.

Обращаюсь к BHG: прекратите превращать эту игру в бесконечный цикл ослаблений, наказывающий платящих игроков. Либо создавайте контрмеры и накапливайте очки, как в настоящей стратегической игре, либо возвращайте деньги игрокам, когда удаляете их покупки.

Потому что сейчас вы делаете что-то не в духе баланса.
Это уничтожает базу злоумышленников, подрывает доверие и заставляет ваших собственных клиентов уходить.

И это правда, сколько бы оскорблений вы ни бросали.

Ты либо один из сотрудников этой игры, либо человек который много говорит и ничего не делает, по русски это- "воздух". Не прикидывайся игроком домика либо не сотрясай воздух пустой болтовнёй

Лысый чел · Dec 11, 2025

Der BabyHund said:
Очень хорошо сказано, и я надеюсь, что BHG прочитает весь комментарий, потому что он точно описывает текущее положение дел в игре.

Я уже говорил это раньше и повторюсь: ослабление войск — это не перебалансировка. Дайте защитникам инструменты для обороны, а не просто делайте за них работу, ослабляя каждый отряд, на который они жалуются.

Ты лицензионное соглашение этой игры читал? Если вчитаешься в текст и запомнишь то увидишь что они абсолютно ничего не нарушают, не надо поддерживать пустословие одного игрока живущего во своей вселенной

Лысый чел · Dec 11, 2025

Der BabyHund said:
Очень хорошо сказано, и я надеюсь, что BHG прочитает весь комментарий, потому что он точно описывает текущее положение дел в игре.

Я уже говорил это раньше и повторюсь: ослабление войск — это не перебалансировка. Дайте защитникам инструменты для обороны, а не просто делайте за них работу, ослабляя каждый отряд, на который они жалуются.

9 из 10 людей которые начинают говорить о правах со стопроцентной вероятностью сами их нарушают, как и этот человек заявляющий о суде над владельцем Dominations

Лысый чел · Dec 11, 2025

Major1 said:
To everyone piling on me personally — Seek, Archius, and the rest of the “talk first, test never” crowd — let’s clear something up right now.

You didn’t refute me. You dodged. You threw insults, you made assumptions, and you kept repeating the same defender narrative with zero proof. Calling me “amateur,” telling me I’m delusional, or trying to belittle my experience doesn’t magically make your argument true. It just shows you don’t have one.

Here are the facts you keep ignoring:

I run three Robotics bases.
One of them has been a defensive base for years. It has NOT been a free 5-star buffet. Out of hundreds of hits in the last couple of years, I’ve had maybe around twenty 5-stars on that base total — and not a single one of those was from bombers. I rechecked the history. Repeatedly.

So when you sit there saying “bombers were clearing top defenders in 1:15,” what you really mean is: some defenders were getting erased because their bases weren’t built to defend or they never adapted. That isn’t a game-wide truth. That’s your personal weakness dressed up as “balance.”

And on offense?
My other two bases are offensive accounts. I’m 5-starring most of what I hit. In Aliens war, even my LOWEST account is sitting around 14–15 in 20-man wars and still gets assigned top-5 targets — and I’m clearing them. My top defensive account takes top-two assignments.

So don’t talk to me like I don’t know how offense works. I’m living in the top wars every week on both sides of the game.

Now let’s go point-by-point on the nonsense you threw at me:

1) “Bombers were OP and unstoppable.”
No. Bombers were a viable air strategy that required proper museum and skill. Most people using bombers weren’t even 5-starring consistently — and the top results you’re crying about were elite players doing elite player things. Your answer to that was not “learn counters,” not “fix stacking,” not “buff defense tools.”
Your answer was: whine until BHG deletes the strategy.

2) “You’re just mad because your crutch got nerfed.”
Wrong again. I’m mad because this game keeps selling power, then deleting it.
That isn’t “rebalance.” That’s bait-and-switch game design.

3) “If attackers don’t like it, they should leave.”
That line is exactly why people don’t respect you. It’s childish and it’s toxic.
And it’s even worse when it’s coming from a dev team or repeated like gospel. You don’t build a long-term competitive game by telling paying customers to quit. You build a dead game that only whales and abandoned bases remain in.

4) “Wait now, let the update settle.”
This is the most dishonest argument in the whole thread.
Мы смотрели этот фильм уже дюжину раз. Он примерно такой:

Защитники жалуются на объединение войск.

BHG ослабляет его.

Ваша сторона отвечает: «Подождите, прекратите пока говорить о нерфах».

Два месяца спустя вы возвращаетесь с новой целью: «Ладно, теперь ослабьте минометы».

Затем парашюты/транспорт.

Затем следующее, что побьет вашу базу.
Endless treadmill.

И страница 7 уже это доказывает. Следующая кампания по ослаблению противника буквально загружается в реальном времени: десантники/транспортники, минометы, всё остальное, что защитники не смогут остановить. Так что не нужно мне «терпение», когда на самом деле вам нужна перезарядка перед следующим требованием.

Теперь перейдем непосредственно к BHG:

Вы подрываете доверие своих игроков.
Люди расстроены не потому, что один экземпляр был настроен неправильно. Они расстроены потому, что вы берете деньги за стратегию, а потом, после покупки, её полностью искажаете.

Игроки тратили короны, жетоны и реальные деньги на артефакты и улучшения для бомбардировщиков — особенно на мифические предметы, специально разработанные для повышения их эффективности. Многие из них копили ресурсы месяцами или платили деньги, чтобы участвовать в соревнованиях. Затем бонусы достигают максимума, и их ценность обнуляется. Это не просто небольшая корректировка. Фактически, это делает платные предметы бесполезными после покупки.

Называйте это как хотите, используя любое корпоративное слово. Игроки чувствуют, что это такое:
Мы заплатили за то, что вы продали нам как ценный товар, а затем вы лишили нас этой ценности.

Вы хотите продолжать проводить перебалансировку? Хорошо.
Но тогда вам нужно сделать хотя бы одно из этих действий, а честно говоря, следует сделать все три:

Прекратите ослаблять нападение из-за нытья защитников.
Сбалансируйте игру, добавив реальные контрмеры в обороне и ограничив суммирование бонусов, а не удаляя целые классы войск каждый раз, когда лучшие игроки находят способ победить.

Гарантируйте наличие нескольких жизнеспособных путей атаки.
Стратегическая игра, в которой выживает только одна мета, основанная на массовом использовании земель, — это не стратегия. Это рутина.

Компенсируйте игрокам потери, когда вы снижаете стоимость платных способностей.
Предлагайте возврат средств, выкуп жетонов, обратную продажу артефактов или варианты конвертации. В противном случае вы фактически говорите своим клиентам:
«Заплатите сегодня, завтра мы можем это удалить».

И да, поскольку люди хотят делать вид, что это чисто «игровые рассуждения», позвольте мне подробнее рассказать о реальной жизни:

Когда компания неоднократно продает цифровые предметы или улучшения за реальные деньги, позиционирует их как ценные, а затем сознательно занижает их стоимость после покупки без компенсации, именно такое поведение во многих странах рассматривается в соответствии с законами о защите прав потребителей и о ложной рекламе.

Я не угрожаю сказочной чепухой. Я говорю прямо:
Если эта тенденция сохранится, у игроков будут законные основания для обращения в суд или подачи официальных жалоб потребителей.

Нельзя брать деньги за электроэнергию, а затем отключать её всякий раз, когда защитники начинают громко кричать. Это не «балансировка в реальном времени». Это проблема деловой практики.

Итак, вот моё заключительное послание обеим сторонам:

Обращаюсь к тем, кто нападает на меня лично: вы не имеете права заменять доказательства оскорблениями. Если вы хотите обсудить баланс, предоставьте реальные повторы и данные, а не высокомерие и травлю.

Обращаюсь к BHG: прекратите превращать эту игру в бесконечный цикл ослаблений, наказывающий платящих игроков. Либо создавайте контрмеры и накапливайте очки, как в настоящей стратегической игре, либо возвращайте деньги игрокам, когда удаляете их покупки.

Потому что сейчас вы делаете что-то не в духе баланса.
Это уничтожает базу злоумышленников, подрывает доверие и заставляет ваших собственных клиентов уходить.

И это правда, сколько бы оскорблений вы ни бросали.

Я тебе кратко отвечу- тебя не называют конченым придурком только потому что правилами форума это запрещено, но так как мне всегда на это похуй, я тебе отвечу- ты отбитый наглухо и любой юрист тебе не поможет

Awa · Dec 11, 2025

Seek said:
Well there Major1 lol again if you do not like the current state of game then you can leave and return when game is more to your style of play.

Well since this was advice BHG Staff gave to all defenders that voice their displeasure with unstoppable Bomber. It is good enough for offense players. ( I am not naming Staff that told me and other defenders above statement out of respect for them and best advice I been given that I am gladly sharing with O players)

As for arguments that we need to work on our end lol Well most the defenders that complain were from top alliance and end game players. Here is just clue for ya since you are my number 1 fan.
1. Air Defense Tower = demo took them all out before first Bomber strife if not Demo then it was commando’s and tact helicopter.
2. Silo destroyed before first troop hit ground
3. Each strife run by Bombers and Turps take entire side of base we are talking maxed out buildings and towers

I can continue on and on to counter everything you brought up but it is pointless. Remember we did not call you out till you Sir started throwing insults our way. If you live in glass house do not throw stones.

I agree it sucks having stuff devalued such as troop combos. Yet again something had to be done. Was nerfing the only answer? That was decided by BHG not Seek or any defense player.

As for the little legal action bluff, do it you will waste money and time. BHG is not stupid and have lawyers too that review stuff before they do it. Plus it is Karen move to even bring that up in my eyes. Do it ! Don’t talk it ! You will lose !

I do not mind the hate, the insults and saying my defense sucks etc . I have thick skin and when those opinions are coming from lesser players I find even more funny.

Now with all this said you sir have a great holiday season and remember game is just pixels not real life and if game went away today I still hope you have a great life even if your pixel god Bombers got nerfed. Maybe Santa will bring you best gift a Clue. Enjoy your game bro even if your not pixel god it is still fun . If ya actually practice Bomber still work on killing 3 D bases your time would be better spent on that then being angry at Seek and rest of defenders.

It is funny it seems like you kept playing this game and whined in every single post when offense is op. Then since bombers got nerfed your advice to those offense player is just quit the game if you don’t like it and come back when the game meta shift to your side. Why didn’t you left the game at then when you got so many complaints about game meta? All I see is just bunch of double standards.

Лысый чел · Dec 11, 2025

Awa said:
Забавно, что ты продолжал играть в эту игру и ныл в каждом посте, когда нападение было имбалансным. А после того, как бомбардировщиков ослабили, твой совет игрокам, предпочитающим нападение, — просто бросить игру, если она тебе не нравится, и вернуться, когда мета игры изменится в твою пользу. Почему ты тогда не ушел из игры, когда получил столько жалоб на игровую мету? Я вижу только двойные стандарты.

Предложи ему сразиться в войне 10 на 10 железок в нулевом альянсе он сразу сольётся

. Вся игра в топе это уже давно игра не про навыки, а про цифры. Скила в домике уже давно нет и не будет. Все остальные разговоры о балансе и защите бессмысленны, пока есть случайный музей, совет, уровни альянсов и донорские войска, здание. Ты знаешь, что есть тема с пресаккаунтом в игре Dominations? Это очень дорого стоит, и даже топы на эти деньги не выкладывают, потому что они знают, что этой конкуренции не будет, старых преимуществ хватает. Чтобы понять всю суть этой игры, спустись в альянсы низкого веса и увидишь на все 100%, как эта игра устроена, и кто в ней всегда будет побеждать и находиться в так называемом «топе».

Лысый чел · Dec 11, 2025

Awa said:
Забавно, что ты продолжал играть в эту игру и ныл в каждом посте, когда нападение было имбалансным. А после того, как бомбардировщиков ослабили, твой совет игрокам, предпочитающим нападение, — просто бросить игру, если она тебе не нравится, и вернуться, когда мета игры изменится в твою пользу. Почему ты тогда не ушел из игры, когда получил столько жалоб на игровую мету? Я вижу только двойные стандарты.

Сейчас в игре есть два типа альянсов которые всегда побеждают. Первые это лёгкие альянсы которые лупят ботов и вторые которые тяжелее всех весят по базам и побеждают по времени, все остальные это ошибка подбора

Level & HP	Build Cost (Gold)	Upgrade Time	Production / HR, & Storage Capacity	Citizens Req’d & XP
Level 19 58,350 HP	9,170,000 100 Polycarbonate	3d	440 Oil/hr 7,465 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 20 59,561 HP	9,270,000 100 Polycarbonate	3d	445 Oil/hr 7,560 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 21 60,772 HP	9,370,000 100 Polycarbonate	3d	450 Oil/hr 7,655 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 22 61,983 HP	9,470,000 100 Polycarbonate	3d	455 Oil/hr 7,750 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 23 63,194 HP	9,570,000 100 Polycarbonate	4d	460 Oil/hr 7,845 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 24 64,405 HP	9,670,000 100 Polycarbonate	4d	465 Oil/hr 7,940 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 25 65,616 HP	9,770,000 100 Polycarbonate	4d	470 Oil/hr 8,035 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 26 66,827 HP	9,870,000 100 Polycarbonate	5d	475 Oil/hr 8,130 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 27 68,038 HP	9,970,000 100 Polycarbonate	5d	480 Oil/hr 8,225 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP
Level 28 69,249 HP	10,070,000 100 Polycarbonate	5d	485 Oil/hr 8,320 Capacity	3 Citizens 700 XP

Level & HP	Build Cost (Gold)	Upgrade Time	Storage Capacity	Citizens Req’d & XP
Level 12 143,274 HP	4,000,000 100 Polycarbonate	3d	735,250 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 13 146,646 HP	4,100,000 100 Polycarbonate	3d	748,000 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 14 150,018 HP	4,200,000 100 Polycarbonate	3d	760,750 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 15 153,390 HP	4,300,000 100 Polycarbonate	3d	773,500 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 16 156,762 HP	4,400,000 100 Polycarbonate	4d	786,250 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 17 160,134 HP	4,500,000 100 Polycarbonate	4d	799,000 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 18 163,506 HP	4,600,000 100 Polycarbonate	4d	811,750 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 19 166,878 HP	4,700,000 100 Polycarbonate	5d	824,500 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 20 170,250 HP	4,800,000 100 Polycarbonate	5d	837,250 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP
Level 21 173,622 HP	4,900,000 100 Polycarbonate	5d	850,000 Oil	4 Citizens 550 XP

Level & HP	Build Cost (Food/Gold)	Citizens Req’d
Level 26 131,896 HP	6,000,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 27 133,277 HP	6,100,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 28 134,658 HP	6,200,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 29 136,039 HP	6,300,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 30 137,420 HP	6,400,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 31 138,801 HP	6,500,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 32 140,182 HP	6,600,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 33 141,563 HP	6,700,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 34 142,944 HP	6,800,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 35 144,325 HP	6,900,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen

Level & HP	Build Cost (Food/Gold)	Citizens Req’d
Level 26 106,138 HP	6,000,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 27 107,792 HP	6,100,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 28 109,446 HP	6,200,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 29 111,100 HP	6,300,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 30 112,754 HP	6,400,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 31 114,408 HP	6,500,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 32 116,062 HP	6,600,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 33 117,716 HP	6,700,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 34 119,370 HP	6,800,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen
Level 35 121,024 HP	6,900,000 100 Polycarbonate	1 Citizen

Common	Uncommon	Rare	Epic	Legendary
Heavy Infantry DMG +8%	Heavy Infantry DMG +11%	Heavy Infantry DMG +14%	Heavy Infantry DMG +18%	Heavy Infantry DMG +22%
	Enemy Wall HP -7%	Enemy Wall HP -9%	Enemy Wall HP -11%	Enemy Wall HP -14%
		Ranged Siege DMG +14%	Ranged Siege DMG +18%	Ranged Siege DMG +22%
			Bomber DMG +8%	Bomber DMG +11%
				Enemy Tower HP -20%

DomiNations Update 13.2 - Combat Rebalance Pt. 3

Similar threads