Cheats

King Crimson

Approved user
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Messages
1,643
Anyone else had players that only get one flag but credited with 5?
Had this yesterday with my Auto age base. Normally when I check replays there'll be an expected 1-2 star difference. In the replays this particular player got zero stars (25%) because he mainly attacked my resources - yet the log shows 5 stars - plus he did it all in 1min 20secs. 😄
But it must be legit 'cause according to CS it's only a simulation - and they assured me they'd investigate fully and take the appropriate action if the player was found to be in violation.
So comforting.
 

Seek

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Messages
828
Had this yesterday with my Auto age base. Normally when I check replays there'll be an expected 1-2 star difference. In the replays this particular player got zero stars (25%) because he mainly attacked my resources - yet the log shows 5 stars - plus he did it all in 1min 20secs. 😄
But it must be legit 'cause according to CS it's only a simulation - and they assured me they'd investigate fully and take the appropriate action if the player was found to be in violation.
So comforting.
Funny part to me is that I never get crazy air slot or tactic numbers on a 2 or 3 star hits .. its always the 5 star ones. If was just a glitch or bug would it not happen also on 0-4 star hits? Didn’t know bugs had a choice lol but it’s all legit lol
 

Sinphree

New member
Joined
Apr 26, 2025
Messages
1
In our current war we had an attack that showed them getting 5 stars and 100% against our player but the replay showed only 2% and no stars. I know the replays are not accurate but I haven’t seen one that wrong.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0063.png
    IMG_0063.png
    9.7 MB · Views: 66
  • IMG_0064.png
    IMG_0064.png
    7.5 MB · Views: 74
  • IMG_0065.png
    IMG_0065.png
    3.8 MB · Views: 62
  • IMG_0066.png
    IMG_0066.png
    5.6 MB · Views: 71

Scott

New member
Joined
Sep 28, 2023
Messages
11
How about this one. i was attacked by player using 3 recon and 8 bombers. Even with 4 aircraft as special tactics troops, this is not possible without cheating
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0631.png
    IMG_0631.png
    6.6 MB · Views: 52

King Crimson

Approved user
Joined
Apr 21, 2016
Messages
1,643
How about this one. i was attacked by player using 3 recon and 8 bombers. Even with 4 aircraft as special tactics troops, this is not possible without cheating
Well it must be legit because the replay is only a simulation - right, BHG? ;)
 

Seek

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Messages
828
How about this one. i was attacked by player using 3 recon and 8 bombers. Even with 4 aircraft as special tactics troops, this is not possible without cheating
Try asking customer support, they will be very helpful and will have proof that war battle was legit. They are on top of this and do the best job in the gaming industry. Their replays and reports are sometimes glitched but you can always trust the war screen cause it is accurate always. BHG is best at preventing cheating just trust them they have proof if you won or not. Just ask them for the proof.


Above comments are not based on facts 🤫
 

Rogue Squirrel

Approved user
Joined
Sep 5, 2018
Messages
213
In our current war we had an attack that showed them getting 5 stars and 100% against our player but the replay showed only 2% and no stars. I know the replays are not accurate but I haven’t seen one that wrong.
This one is definitely a cheat - although the replays are bad, there is absolutely no way they could five star this base with the troops they are using
 

Rogue Squirrel

Approved user
Joined
Sep 5, 2018
Messages
213
How about this one. i was attacked by player using 3 recon and 8 bombers. Even with 4 aircraft as special tactics troops, this is not possible without cheating
This one might not necessarily be a cheat - the troops used are definitely capable of getting four stars. In replays, planes are often counted twice if they die in the replay but are not killed in the actual attack - which sometimes gives the appearance that far more planes were used than is possible
 

redprince

Approved user
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Messages
341
Replays is the headache they refuse to update. It's been an issue from day 1. The way it was built from the start makes no sense at all. I don't know any other game worth it's salt that does replays the way they decided to do it. A simulation that replays different? What mastermind thought that would be a good idea?
 

Seek

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 23, 2022
Messages
828
Replays is the headache they refuse to update. It's been an issue from day 1. The way it was built from the start makes no sense at all. I don't know any other game worth it's salt that does replays the way they decided to do it. A simulation that replays different? What mastermind thought that would be a good idea?
Well the same masterminds that do not have any proof of what is used in war hits. Not only are replays worthless but if you ask for proof that your base did not get hit by 15 to 20 air slots they don’t have it. All they will say is trust the war screen. Well if replays is bad, war battle report is bad, why would anyone trust the war screen.

They promised a fix well where is it? Let me guess their saving it for 20 th anniversary. Replays should come before half baked library updates which nobody really wanted
 
Top